Modern+Terrorism

media type="custom" key="23770192"



http://prezi.com/y0dxphyzfue4/?utm_campaign=share&utm_medium=copy

__**Modern Terrorism Timeline Opener:**__
 * 1. Explain the types of terrorism used in the events you identified in your timeline?**
 * -** There was terrorism involving kidnapping, hijacking, bombing and chemical warfare.

- They brought fear, panic, and paronia to society and the citizens living in the places that those attacks took place in. Also even those who didn't live in those places were still fearful of what might happen next and if it could happen to them or where they lived.
 * 2. How did these events impact ordinary citizens?**


 * 3. Why did it get world attention?**
 * -** It got world attention because of how they did the attacks and how much harm they caused to the people, physically and emotionally.

media type="custom" key="23891624"

media type="custom" key="23891754"

__Northern Ireland__: 1. I believe that they had a reason to use force but not as much as they did. 2. No the way the force was used was not acceptable because a shooting of a shopping mall filled with innocent civilians should not have been necessary to meet their goal of independence. 3. The state had a right to use force upon the protesters because they were using force, so they had no other choice.
 * Case Study Questions**

__Chechnya:__ 1. I do believe that their violence was justifiable. 2. Their way of using force was acceptable except the school hostage taking was unnecessary especially because they were innocent children. 3. The state used too much force against Chechynians even those who weren't involved.

__Chiapas:__ 1. No I don't think they had a reason to cause the violence they did because none of them really knew for what they were fighting for. 2. No, they used too much violence for a cause that should have nothing to do with violence. There could have been other solutions to this. 3. The state used too much violence especially after the attacks to try to get information out of the people in the villages and those who supported them.

__South Africa:__ 1. Yes they did have a justifiable reason to use violence because they were denied their basic human rights. 2. They did use their force in an appropriate way because it was only aimed for the government not the civilians. 3. The state should not have used force at all but should have met with their civilians needs.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1me64FFGbgmHfRy-33ZfLhq0-VTfdIqY88xJZSWJ3U6A/edit?usp=sharing
 * Rough Draft - Position Paper**

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hJZ93Sbt4cb6PnAmdicGc-zOkYYqQIMJApqF3z7xids/edit?usp=sharing
 * Final Draft - Joint Position Paper**

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1tOsFfOd5s2Wg9UmCWnrna42H95zLL01MfLdefxrL4m8/edit?usp=sharing
 * Google Presentation - CEPA**